The use of certain inhaled anesthetics during breast cancer surgery may increase the risk of cancer spreading in the body, a new study done in mice suggests.
The study, “Distinct effects of general anesthetics on lung metastasis mediated by IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway in mouse models,” was published in Nature Communications.
Surgery to cut out a tumor (resection) remains a mainstay of cancer treatment; when feasible, it is often considered the optimal first-line therapy. Yet, cancer cells can metastasize (spread) to other organs, even after removal of the primary tumor. Such metastases are a major cause of cancer-related health problems.
The factors that control this spreading are still not completely understood. Some previous research has suggested that people who are given inhaled anesthetics, such as sevoflurane, during surgery have worse outcomes than those given injected anesthetics, such as propofol. However, whether choice of anesthetics affects metastasis itself has been unclear.
In the new study, researchers tested this directly using mice. Breast cancer cells (both murine and human cells were used) were injected into the mice’s mammary tissue and allowed to grow into a tumor. Then, that primary tumor was surgically removed, with the mice anesthetized with either sevoflurane or propofol. After waiting a few more weeks, the researchers examined the mice’s lungs for the presence of cancer cell metastases.
Mice that were anesthetized using sevoflurane had significantly more metastases than those anesthetized with propofol.
“[W]e demonstrated that sevoflurane was associated with significant increased lung metastasis than propofol in two models, one with murine breast cancer cells and one with human breast cancer cells,” the researchers wrote.
They then conducted experiments to determine what was causing this effect. First, they tested whether continuously administering anesthesia (on several days over the course of weeks) increased metastases to a greater extent than just one administration (as was done for surgery). In the end, the researchers found that additional doses of sevoflurane did not increase the number of metastases.
Furthermore, when the cancer cells were exposed to the anesthetic in dishes, they were significantly less mobile — the exact opposite of what would be expected given the increase in metastases. Together, these results suggested that the metastasis-promoting effect probably is not because of the effect of the anesthetic on the cancer cells themselves.
Thus, the researchers examined the tumor microenvironment, which is the mixture of connective and supportive non-cancerous cells that tumors co-opt to support their growth. They found that sevoflurane, but not propofol, increased the production of interleukin 6 (IL-6) in the tumor microenvironment.
IL-6 is an inflammatory signaling molecule that has been shown to play important roles in metastasis, so increased IL-6 is a potential mechanism for the increased metastasis. To validate this idea, the researchers used a small molecule to block IL-6 signaling. Doing so significantly decreased the number of metastases in sevoflurane-anesthetized mice, but had no effect in propofol-anesthetized mice.
“Our study demonstrates the distinct effects of two modern general anesthetics in breast cancer metastasis in two preclinical animal models,” the researchers wrote.
They noted that, while animal models never perfectly recapitulate human disease, this finding “represents a step toward the evidence-based choice of anesthetics in breast cancer patients.”
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Let us improve this post!
Tell us how we can improve this post?